← Back to Harvard snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Harvard vs Kearney, NE

Kearney currently scores 12 points higher overall than Harvard, with the largest gap in tornado.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Harvard

41/100

Open city page →

Kearney

53/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Harvard: 41/100 · Kearney: 53/100

Kearney is 12 points higher.

Flood

Harvard: 38/100 · Kearney: 41/100

Kearney is 3 points higher.

Harvard: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.

Kearney: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Harvard: 19/100 · Kearney: 19/100

No gap.

Harvard: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Kearney: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Harvard: 39/100 · Kearney: 38/100

Harvard is 1 points higher.

Harvard: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Kearney: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Harvard: 8/100 · Kearney: 73/100

Kearney is 65 points higher.

Harvard: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Kearney: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Harvard: 100/100 · Kearney: 100/100

No gap.

Harvard: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Kearney: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Harvard: Unavailable · Kearney: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Harvard: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Kearney: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Harvard: 43/100 · Kearney: 48/100

Kearney is 5 points higher.

Harvard: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Kearney: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Harvard: Unavailable · Kearney: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Harvard: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.

Kearney: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.