← Back to Curtis snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Curtis vs McCook, NE

McCook currently scores 1 points higher overall than Curtis, with the largest gap in lightning.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Curtis

44/100

Open city page →

McCook

45/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Curtis: 44/100 · McCook: 45/100

McCook is 1 points higher.

Flood

Curtis: 38/100 · McCook: 35/100

Curtis is 3 points higher.

Curtis: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

McCook: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Curtis: 19/100 · McCook: 19/100

No gap.

Curtis: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

McCook: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Curtis: 55/100 · McCook: 59/100

McCook is 4 points higher.

Curtis: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

McCook: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Curtis: 19/100 · McCook: 23/100

McCook is 4 points higher.

Curtis: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

McCook: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Curtis: 100/100 · McCook: 100/100

No gap.

Curtis: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

McCook: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Curtis: Unavailable · McCook: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Curtis: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

McCook: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Curtis: 30/100 · McCook: 34/100

McCook is 4 points higher.

Curtis: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

McCook: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Curtis: Unavailable · McCook: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Curtis: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.

McCook: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.