City vs city

Culbertson vs McCook, NE

Culbertson currently scores 4 points higher overall than McCook, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Culbertson

49/100

Open city page →

McCook

45/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Culbertson: 49/100 · McCook: 45/100

Culbertson is 4 points higher.

Flood

Culbertson: 47/100 · McCook: 35/100

Culbertson is 12 points higher.

Culbertson: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

McCook: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Culbertson: 19/100 · McCook: 19/100

No gap.

Culbertson: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

McCook: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Culbertson: 59/100 · McCook: 59/100

No gap.

Culbertson: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

McCook: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Culbertson: 31/100 · McCook: 23/100

Culbertson is 8 points higher.

Culbertson: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

McCook: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Culbertson: 100/100 · McCook: 100/100

No gap.

Culbertson: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

McCook: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Culbertson: Unavailable · McCook: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Culbertson: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

McCook: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Culbertson: 35/100 · McCook: 34/100

Culbertson is 1 points higher.

Culbertson: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

McCook: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Culbertson: Unavailable · McCook: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Culbertson: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.

McCook: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.