City vs city
Creighton vs Osmond, NE
Creighton currently scores 4 points higher overall than Osmond, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Creighton: 37/100 · Osmond: 33/100
Creighton is 4 points higher.
Flood
Creighton: 33/100 · Osmond: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Creighton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Osmond: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Wind
Creighton: 21/100 · Osmond: 20/100
Creighton is 1 points higher.
Creighton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Osmond: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Creighton: 31/100 · Osmond: 29/100
Creighton is 2 points higher.
Creighton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Osmond: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Creighton: 8/100 · Osmond: 4/100
Creighton is 4 points higher.
Creighton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Osmond: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Creighton: 66/100 · Osmond: 92/100
Osmond is 26 points higher.
Creighton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Osmond: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Creighton: Unavailable · Osmond: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Creighton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Osmond: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Creighton: 62/100 · Osmond: 54/100
Creighton is 8 points higher.
Creighton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Osmond: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Creighton: Unavailable · Osmond: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Creighton: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.
Osmond: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.