City vs city
Clinton vs Hay Springs, NE
Clinton currently scores 6 points higher overall than Hay Springs, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Clinton: 40/100 · Hay Springs: 34/100
Clinton is 6 points higher.
Flood
Clinton: Unavailable · Hay Springs: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Clinton: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Hay Springs: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Wind
Clinton: 19/100 · Hay Springs: 19/100
No gap.
Clinton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Hay Springs: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Clinton: 38/100 · Hay Springs: 39/100
Hay Springs is 1 points higher.
Clinton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Hay Springs: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Clinton: 23/100 · Hay Springs: 4/100
Clinton is 19 points higher.
Clinton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hay Springs: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Clinton: 100/100 · Hay Springs: 100/100
No gap.
Clinton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hay Springs: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Clinton: Unavailable · Hay Springs: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Clinton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Hay Springs: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Clinton: 73/100 · Hay Springs: 44/100
Clinton is 29 points higher.
Clinton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Hay Springs: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Clinton: 27/100 · Hay Springs: 30/100
Hay Springs is 3 points higher.
Clinton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Hay Springs: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.