← Back to Chappell snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Chappell vs Oshkosh, NE

Chappell currently scores 2 points higher overall than Oshkosh, with the largest gap in lightning.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Chappell

53/100

Open city page →

Oshkosh

51/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Chappell: 53/100 · Oshkosh: 51/100

Chappell is 2 points higher.

Flood

Chappell: 47/100 · Oshkosh: 43/100

Chappell is 4 points higher.

Chappell: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.

Oshkosh: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Chappell: 19/100 · Oshkosh: 19/100

No gap.

Chappell: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Oshkosh: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Chappell: 63/100 · Oshkosh: 58/100

Chappell is 5 points higher.

Chappell: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Oshkosh: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Chappell: 0/100 · Oshkosh: 0/100

No gap.

Chappell: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Oshkosh: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Chappell: 100/100 · Oshkosh: 100/100

No gap.

Chappell: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Oshkosh: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Chappell: Unavailable · Oshkosh: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Chappell: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Oshkosh: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Chappell: 37/100 · Oshkosh: 33/100

Chappell is 4 points higher.

Chappell: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Oshkosh: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Chappell: Unavailable · Oshkosh: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Chappell: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.

Oshkosh: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.