← Back to Archer snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Archer vs St. Paul, NE

St. Paul currently scores 5 points higher overall than Archer, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Archer

43/100

Open city page →

St. Paul

48/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Archer: 43/100 · St. Paul: 48/100

St. Paul is 5 points higher.

Flood

Archer: 100/100 · St. Paul: 59/100

Archer is 41 points higher.

Archer: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.

St. Paul: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Archer: 20/100 · St. Paul: 20/100

No gap.

Archer: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

St. Paul: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Archer: 49/100 · St. Paul: 52/100

St. Paul is 3 points higher.

Archer: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

St. Paul: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Archer: 4/100 · St. Paul: 27/100

St. Paul is 23 points higher.

Archer: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

St. Paul: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Archer: 46/100 · St. Paul: 100/100

St. Paul is 54 points higher.

Archer: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

St. Paul: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Archer: Unavailable · St. Paul: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Archer: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

St. Paul: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Archer: 37/100 · St. Paul: 30/100

Archer is 7 points higher.

Archer: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

St. Paul: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Current air quality

Archer: Unavailable · St. Paul: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Archer: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.

St. Paul: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.