City vs city
Mott vs Regent, ND
Regent currently scores 1 points higher overall than Mott, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Mott: 39/100 · Regent: 40/100
Regent is 1 points higher.
Flood
Mott: 43/100 · Regent: 47/100
Regent is 4 points higher.
Mott: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Regent: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Mott: 19/100 · Regent: 18/100
Mott is 1 points higher.
Mott: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Regent: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Mott: 27/100 · Regent: 27/100
No gap.
Mott: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Regent: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Mott: 12/100 · Regent: 0/100
Mott is 12 points higher.
Mott: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Regent: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Mott: 100/100 · Regent: 100/100
No gap.
Mott: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Regent: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Mott: Unavailable · Regent: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Mott: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Regent: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Mott: 39/100 · Regent: 17/100
Mott is 22 points higher.
Mott: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Regent: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Mott: 33/100 · Regent: 31/100
Mott is 2 points higher.
Mott: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Regent: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city