← Back to Forbes snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Forbes vs Kulm, ND

Forbes currently scores 5 points higher overall than Kulm, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Forbes

33/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Forbes: 33/100 · Kulm: 28/100

Forbes is 5 points higher.

Flood

Forbes: 5/100 · Kulm: 36/100

Kulm is 31 points higher.

Forbes: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.

Kulm: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Forbes: 20/100 · Kulm: 20/100

No gap.

Forbes: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Kulm: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Forbes: 33/100 · Kulm: 37/100

Kulm is 4 points higher.

Forbes: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Kulm: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Forbes: 0/100 · Kulm: 0/100

No gap.

Forbes: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Kulm: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Forbes: 86/100 · Kulm: 28/100

Forbes is 58 points higher.

Forbes: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Kulm: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Forbes: Unavailable · Kulm: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Forbes: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Kulm: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Forbes: 21/100 · Kulm: 21/100

No gap.

Forbes: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Kulm: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Forbes: Unavailable · Kulm: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Forbes: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.

Kulm: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.