City vs city
Dickinson vs Fort Totten, ND
Fort Totten currently scores 1 points higher overall than Dickinson, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Dickinson: 35/100 · Fort Totten: 36/100
Fort Totten is 1 points higher.
Flood
Dickinson: 41/100 · Fort Totten: 41/100
No gap.
Dickinson: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Fort Totten: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Dickinson: 18/100 · Fort Totten: 19/100
Fort Totten is 1 points higher.
Dickinson: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Fort Totten: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Dickinson: 24/100 · Fort Totten: 19/100
Dickinson is 5 points higher.
Dickinson: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Fort Totten: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Dickinson: 4/100 · Fort Totten: 0/100
Dickinson is 4 points higher.
Dickinson: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Fort Totten: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Dickinson: 100/100 · Fort Totten: 40/100
Dickinson is 60 points higher.
Dickinson: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Fort Totten: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Dickinson: Unavailable · Fort Totten: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Dickinson: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Fort Totten: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Dickinson: 27/100 · Fort Totten: 62/100
Fort Totten is 35 points higher.
Dickinson: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Fort Totten: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Dickinson: 29/100 · Fort Totten: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Dickinson: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Fort Totten: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.