City vs city
Carpio vs Foxholm, ND
Foxholm currently scores 7 points higher overall than Carpio, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Carpio: 23/100 · Foxholm: 30/100
Foxholm is 7 points higher.
Flood
Carpio: Unavailable · Foxholm: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Carpio: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Foxholm: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Wind
Carpio: 18/100 · Foxholm: 18/100
No gap.
Carpio: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Foxholm: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Carpio: 30/100 · Foxholm: 28/100
Carpio is 2 points higher.
Carpio: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Foxholm: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Carpio: 0/100 · Foxholm: 0/100
No gap.
Carpio: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Foxholm: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Carpio: 18/100 · Foxholm: 42/100
Foxholm is 24 points higher.
Carpio: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Foxholm: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Carpio: Unavailable · Foxholm: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Carpio: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Foxholm: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Carpio: 32/100 · Foxholm: 52/100
Foxholm is 20 points higher.
Carpio: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Foxholm: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Carpio: 42/100 · Foxholm: 42/100
No gap.
Carpio: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Foxholm: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.