City vs city
Cando vs Leeds, ND
Leeds currently scores 17 points higher overall than Cando, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Cando: 14/100 · Leeds: 31/100
Leeds is 17 points higher.
Flood
Cando: Unavailable · Leeds: 36/100
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Cando: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Leeds: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Cando: 18/100 · Leeds: 19/100
Leeds is 1 points higher.
Cando: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Leeds: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Cando: 12/100 · Leeds: 15/100
Leeds is 3 points higher.
Cando: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Leeds: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Cando: 4/100 · Leeds: 4/100
No gap.
Cando: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Leeds: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Cando: 19/100 · Leeds: 69/100
Leeds is 50 points higher.
Cando: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Leeds: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Cando: Unavailable · Leeds: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Cando: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Leeds: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Cando: 32/100 · Leeds: 42/100
Leeds is 10 points higher.
Cando: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Leeds: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Cando: 13/100 · Leeds: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Cando: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Leeds: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.