City vs city
Adams vs Edinburg, ND
Adams currently scores 3 points higher overall than Edinburg, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Adams: 23/100 · Edinburg: 20/100
Adams is 3 points higher.
Flood
Adams: 36/100 · Edinburg: 49/100
Edinburg is 13 points higher.
Adams: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Edinburg: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Adams: 18/100 · Edinburg: 18/100
No gap.
Adams: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Edinburg: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Adams: 25/100 · Edinburg: 27/100
Edinburg is 2 points higher.
Adams: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Edinburg: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Adams: 0/100 · Edinburg: 8/100
Edinburg is 8 points higher.
Adams: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Edinburg: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Adams: 27/100 · Edinburg: 16/100
Adams is 11 points higher.
Adams: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Edinburg: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Adams: Unavailable · Edinburg: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Adams: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Edinburg: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Adams: 21/100 · Edinburg: 13/100
Adams is 8 points higher.
Adams: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Edinburg: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Adams: 10/100 · Edinburg: 10/100
No gap.
Adams: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Edinburg: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.