← Back to Graham snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Graham vs Haw River, NC

Graham and Haw River are tied on overall score, with the biggest factor difference in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Graham

44/100

Open city page →

Haw River

44/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Graham: 44/100 · Haw River: 44/100

No gap.

Flood

Graham: 34/100 · Haw River: 34/100

No gap.

Graham: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.

Haw River: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Graham: 20/100 · Haw River: 20/100

No gap.

Graham: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Haw River: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Graham: 46/100 · Haw River: 46/100

No gap.

Graham: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Haw River: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Graham: 0/100 · Haw River: 0/100

No gap.

Graham: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Haw River: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Graham: 86/100 · Haw River: 86/100

No gap.

Graham: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Haw River: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Graham: Unavailable · Haw River: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Graham: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Haw River: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Graham: 49/100 · Haw River: 49/100

No gap.

Graham: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Haw River: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Graham: 31/100 · Haw River: 31/100

No gap.

Graham: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Haw River: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.