City vs city
Fruitland vs Royal Pines, NC
Royal Pines currently scores 6 points higher overall than Fruitland, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Fruitland: 42/100 · Royal Pines: 48/100
Royal Pines is 6 points higher.
Flood
Fruitland: 38/100 · Royal Pines: 38/100
No gap.
Fruitland: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Royal Pines: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 11 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Fruitland: 15/100 · Royal Pines: 15/100
No gap.
Fruitland: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Royal Pines: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Fruitland: 47/100 · Royal Pines: 46/100
Fruitland is 1 points higher.
Fruitland: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Royal Pines: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Fruitland: 4/100 · Royal Pines: 0/100
Fruitland is 4 points higher.
Fruitland: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Royal Pines: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Fruitland: 100/100 · Royal Pines: 91/100
Fruitland is 9 points higher.
Fruitland: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Royal Pines: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Fruitland: Unavailable · Royal Pines: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Fruitland: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Royal Pines: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Fruitland: 59/100 · Royal Pines: 68/100
Royal Pines is 9 points higher.
Fruitland: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Royal Pines: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Fruitland: 32/100 · Royal Pines: 32/100
No gap.
Fruitland: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Royal Pines: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.