City vs city
Coats vs Greensboro, NC
Coats currently scores 5 points higher overall than Greensboro, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Coats: 43/100 · Greensboro: 38/100
Coats is 5 points higher.
Flood
Coats: 28/100 · Greensboro: 43/100
Greensboro is 15 points higher.
Coats: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Greensboro: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Coats: 26/100 · Greensboro: 19/100
Coats is 7 points higher.
Coats: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Greensboro: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Coats: 64/100 · Greensboro: 42/100
Coats is 22 points higher.
Coats: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Greensboro: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Coats: 46/100 · Greensboro: 15/100
Coats is 31 points higher.
Coats: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Greensboro: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Coats: 33/100 · Greensboro: 64/100
Greensboro is 31 points higher.
Coats: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Greensboro: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Coats: Unavailable · Greensboro: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Coats: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Greensboro: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Coats: 71/100 · Greensboro: 49/100
Coats is 22 points higher.
Coats: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Greensboro: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Coats: 30/100 · Greensboro: 35/100
Greensboro is 5 points higher.
Coats: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Greensboro: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.