← Back to Kerr snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Kerr vs Kings Point, MT

Kerr currently scores 1 points higher overall than Kings Point, with the largest gap in wildfire.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Kings Point

24/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Kerr: 25/100 · Kings Point: 24/100

Kerr is 1 points higher.

Flood

Kerr: 46/100 · Kings Point: 89/100

Kings Point is 43 points higher.

Kerr: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.

Kings Point: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Kerr: 14/100 · Kings Point: 14/100

No gap.

Kerr: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Kings Point: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Kerr: 16/100 · Kings Point: 15/100

Kerr is 1 points higher.

Kerr: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Kings Point: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Kerr: 0/100 · Kings Point: 0/100

No gap.

Kerr: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Kings Point: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Kerr: 6/100 · Kings Point: 2/100

Kerr is 4 points higher.

Kerr: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Kings Point: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Kerr: Unavailable · Kings Point: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Kerr: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Kings Point: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Kerr: 56/100 · Kings Point: 9/100

Kerr is 47 points higher.

Kerr: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Kings Point: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Kerr: 14/100 · Kings Point: 16/100

Kings Point is 2 points higher.

Kerr: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Kings Point: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.