City vs city
Hays vs Hilger, MT
Hays currently scores 5 points higher overall than Hilger, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Hays: 26/100 · Hilger: 21/100
Hays is 5 points higher.
Flood
Hays: 26/100 · Hilger: 26/100
No gap.
Hays: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Hilger: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Hays: 17/100 · Hilger: 17/100
No gap.
Hays: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Hilger: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Hays: 16/100 · Hilger: 22/100
Hilger is 6 points higher.
Hays: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Hilger: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Hays: 0/100 · Hilger: 15/100
Hilger is 15 points higher.
Hays: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hilger: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Hays: 31/100 · Hilger: 26/100
Hays is 5 points higher.
Hays: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hilger: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Hays: Unavailable · Hilger: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Hays: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Hilger: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Hays: 54/100 · Hilger: 28/100
Hays is 26 points higher.
Hays: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Hilger: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Hays: 14/100 · Hilger: 14/100
No gap.
Hays: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Hilger: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city