City vs city
Four Corners vs King Arthur Park, MT
Four Corners and King Arthur Park are tied on overall score, with the biggest factor difference in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Four Corners: 26/100 · King Arthur Park: 26/100
No gap.
Flood
Four Corners: 26/100 · King Arthur Park: 26/100
No gap.
Four Corners: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
King Arthur Park: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Four Corners: 15/100 · King Arthur Park: 15/100
No gap.
Four Corners: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
King Arthur Park: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Four Corners: 11/100 · King Arthur Park: 11/100
No gap.
Four Corners: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
King Arthur Park: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Four Corners: 0/100 · King Arthur Park: 0/100
No gap.
Four Corners: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
King Arthur Park: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Four Corners: 46/100 · King Arthur Park: 46/100
No gap.
Four Corners: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
King Arthur Park: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Four Corners: Unavailable · King Arthur Park: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Four Corners: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
King Arthur Park: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Four Corners: 41/100 · King Arthur Park: 41/100
No gap.
Four Corners: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
King Arthur Park: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Four Corners: 15/100 · King Arthur Park: 15/100
No gap.
Four Corners: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
King Arthur Park: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.