City vs city
Elmo vs Lindisfarne, MT
Elmo currently scores 7 points higher overall than Lindisfarne, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Elmo: 29/100 · Lindisfarne: 22/100
Elmo is 7 points higher.
Flood
Elmo: 73/100 · Lindisfarne: 69/100
Elmo is 4 points higher.
Elmo: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Lindisfarne: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Elmo: 14/100 · Lindisfarne: 14/100
No gap.
Elmo: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lindisfarne: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Elmo: 12/100 · Lindisfarne: 13/100
Lindisfarne is 1 points higher.
Elmo: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Lindisfarne: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Elmo: 0/100 · Lindisfarne: 0/100
No gap.
Elmo: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Lindisfarne: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Elmo: 2/100 · Lindisfarne: 4/100
Lindisfarne is 2 points higher.
Elmo: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Lindisfarne: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Elmo: Unavailable · Lindisfarne: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Elmo: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Lindisfarne: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Elmo: 55/100 · Lindisfarne: 12/100
Elmo is 43 points higher.
Elmo: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Lindisfarne: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Elmo: 17/100 · Lindisfarne: 17/100
No gap.
Elmo: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Lindisfarne: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city