City vs city
Cut Bank vs Great Falls, MT
Great Falls currently scores 12 points higher overall than Cut Bank, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Cut Bank: 20/100 · Great Falls: 32/100
Great Falls is 12 points higher.
Flood
Cut Bank: Unavailable · Great Falls: 30/100
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Cut Bank: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Great Falls: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Cut Bank: 15/100 · Great Falls: 16/100
Great Falls is 1 points higher.
Cut Bank: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Great Falls: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Cut Bank: 15/100 · Great Falls: 11/100
Cut Bank is 4 points higher.
Cut Bank: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Great Falls: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Cut Bank: 0/100 · Great Falls: 8/100
Great Falls is 8 points higher.
Cut Bank: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Great Falls: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Cut Bank: 30/100 · Great Falls: 100/100
Great Falls is 70 points higher.
Cut Bank: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Great Falls: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Cut Bank: Unavailable · Great Falls: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Cut Bank: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Great Falls: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Cut Bank: 42/100 · Great Falls: 33/100
Cut Bank is 9 points higher.
Cut Bank: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Great Falls: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Current air quality
Cut Bank: 17/100 · Great Falls: 29/100
Great Falls is 12 points higher.
Cut Bank: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.
Great Falls: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.