City vs city
Corwin Springs vs Gardiner, MT
Corwin Springs currently scores 15 points higher overall than Gardiner, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Corwin Springs: 29/100 · Gardiner: 14/100
Corwin Springs is 15 points higher.
Flood
Corwin Springs: 26/100 · Gardiner: 0/100
Corwin Springs is 26 points higher.
Corwin Springs: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Gardiner: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 0 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Corwin Springs: 15/100 · Gardiner: 15/100
No gap.
Corwin Springs: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Gardiner: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Corwin Springs: 9/100 · Gardiner: 10/100
Gardiner is 1 points higher.
Corwin Springs: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Gardiner: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Corwin Springs: 0/100 · Gardiner: 0/100
No gap.
Corwin Springs: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Gardiner: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Corwin Springs: 0/100 · Gardiner: 1/100
Gardiner is 1 points higher.
Corwin Springs: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Gardiner: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Corwin Springs: Unavailable · Gardiner: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Corwin Springs: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Gardiner: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Corwin Springs: 81/100 · Gardiner: 43/100
Corwin Springs is 38 points higher.
Corwin Springs: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Gardiner: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Corwin Springs: 15/100 · Gardiner: 15/100
No gap.
Corwin Springs: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Gardiner: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.