City vs city
Clinton vs Twin Creeks, MT
Clinton currently scores 1 points higher overall than Twin Creeks, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Clinton: 25/100 · Twin Creeks: 24/100
Clinton is 1 points higher.
Flood
Clinton: 33/100 · Twin Creeks: 26/100
Clinton is 7 points higher.
Clinton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.
Twin Creeks: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Clinton: 14/100 · Twin Creeks: 14/100
No gap.
Clinton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Twin Creeks: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Clinton: 10/100 · Twin Creeks: 14/100
Twin Creeks is 4 points higher.
Clinton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Twin Creeks: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Clinton: 0/100 · Twin Creeks: 0/100
No gap.
Clinton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Twin Creeks: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Clinton: 8/100 · Twin Creeks: 1/100
Clinton is 7 points higher.
Clinton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Twin Creeks: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Clinton: Unavailable · Twin Creeks: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Clinton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Twin Creeks: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Clinton: 74/100 · Twin Creeks: 77/100
Twin Creeks is 3 points higher.
Clinton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Twin Creeks: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Clinton: 12/100 · Twin Creeks: 12/100
No gap.
Clinton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Twin Creeks: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.