City vs city
Cascade vs Ulm, MT
Cascade currently scores 5 points higher overall than Ulm, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Cascade: 26/100 · Ulm: 21/100
Cascade is 5 points higher.
Flood
Cascade: 35/100 · Ulm: 32/100
Cascade is 3 points higher.
Cascade: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Ulm: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Cascade: 15/100 · Ulm: 15/100
No gap.
Cascade: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Ulm: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Cascade: 15/100 · Ulm: 14/100
Cascade is 1 points higher.
Cascade: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Ulm: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Cascade: 0/100 · Ulm: 0/100
No gap.
Cascade: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Ulm: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Cascade: 23/100 · Ulm: 10/100
Cascade is 13 points higher.
Cascade: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Ulm: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Cascade: Unavailable · Ulm: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Cascade: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Ulm: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Cascade: 50/100 · Ulm: 27/100
Cascade is 23 points higher.
Cascade: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ulm: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Cascade: 17/100 · Ulm: 29/100
Ulm is 12 points higher.
Cascade: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Ulm: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.