← Back to Carlton snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Carlton vs Lolo, MT

Carlton currently scores 3 points higher overall than Lolo, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Carlton

28/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Carlton: 28/100 · Lolo: 25/100

Carlton is 3 points higher.

Flood

Carlton: 45/100 · Lolo: 26/100

Carlton is 19 points higher.

Carlton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 11 features intersect this tile.

Lolo: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Carlton: 14/100 · Lolo: 14/100

No gap.

Carlton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lolo: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Carlton: 8/100 · Lolo: 9/100

Lolo is 1 points higher.

Carlton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Lolo: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Carlton: 0/100 · Lolo: 0/100

No gap.

Carlton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Lolo: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Carlton: 28/100 · Lolo: 17/100

Carlton is 11 points higher.

Carlton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Lolo: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Carlton: Unavailable · Lolo: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Carlton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Lolo: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Carlton: 62/100 · Lolo: 74/100

Lolo is 12 points higher.

Carlton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Lolo: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Carlton: 12/100 · Lolo: 12/100

No gap.

Carlton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Lolo: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.