City vs city
Billings vs Worden, MT
Billings currently scores 4 points higher overall than Worden, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Billings: 34/100 · Worden: 30/100
Billings is 4 points higher.
Flood
Billings: 38/100 · Worden: 36/100
Billings is 2 points higher.
Billings: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Worden: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Billings: 17/100 · Worden: 17/100
No gap.
Billings: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Worden: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Billings: 12/100 · Worden: 11/100
Billings is 1 points higher.
Billings: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Worden: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Billings: 8/100 · Worden: 4/100
Billings is 4 points higher.
Billings: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Worden: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Billings: 100/100 · Worden: 79/100
Billings is 21 points higher.
Billings: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Worden: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Billings: Unavailable · Worden: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Billings: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Worden: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Billings: 46/100 · Worden: 44/100
Billings is 2 points higher.
Billings: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Worden: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Billings: 16/100 · Worden: 17/100
Worden is 1 points higher.
Billings: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Worden: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.