← Back to Billings snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Billings vs Culbertson, MT

Billings currently scores 9 points higher overall than Culbertson, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Billings

34/100

Open city page →

Culbertson

25/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Billings: 34/100 · Culbertson: 25/100

Billings is 9 points higher.

Flood

Billings: 38/100 · Culbertson: 27/100

Billings is 11 points higher.

Billings: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

Culbertson: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Billings: 17/100 · Culbertson: 18/100

Culbertson is 1 points higher.

Billings: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Culbertson: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Billings: 12/100 · Culbertson: 22/100

Culbertson is 10 points higher.

Billings: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Culbertson: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Billings: 8/100 · Culbertson: 8/100

No gap.

Billings: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Culbertson: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Billings: 100/100 · Culbertson: 41/100

Billings is 59 points higher.

Billings: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Culbertson: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Billings: Unavailable · Culbertson: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Billings: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Culbertson: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Billings: 46/100 · Culbertson: 46/100

No gap.

Billings: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Culbertson: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Current air quality

Billings: 16/100 · Culbertson: 16/100

No gap.

Billings: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.

Culbertson: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.