← Back to Billings snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Billings vs Condon, MT

Billings currently scores 9 points higher overall than Condon, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Billings

34/100

Open city page →

Condon

25/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Billings: 34/100 · Condon: 25/100

Billings is 9 points higher.

Flood

Billings: 38/100 · Condon: 28/100

Billings is 10 points higher.

Billings: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

Condon: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Billings: 17/100 · Condon: 14/100

Billings is 3 points higher.

Billings: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Condon: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Billings: 12/100 · Condon: 22/100

Condon is 10 points higher.

Billings: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Condon: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Billings: 8/100 · Condon: 4/100

Billings is 4 points higher.

Billings: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Condon: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Billings: 100/100 · Condon: 7/100

Billings is 93 points higher.

Billings: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Condon: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Billings: Unavailable · Condon: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Billings: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Condon: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Billings: 46/100 · Condon: 89/100

Condon is 43 points higher.

Billings: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Condon: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Billings: 16/100 · Condon: 12/100

Billings is 4 points higher.

Billings: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Condon: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.