← Back to Belt snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Belt vs Ulm, MT

Belt currently scores 3 points higher overall than Ulm, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Belt: 24/100 · Ulm: 21/100

Belt is 3 points higher.

Flood

Belt: 26/100 · Ulm: 32/100

Ulm is 6 points higher.

Belt: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.

Ulm: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Belt: 16/100 · Ulm: 15/100

Belt is 1 points higher.

Belt: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Ulm: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Belt: 14/100 · Ulm: 14/100

No gap.

Belt: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Ulm: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Belt: 0/100 · Ulm: 0/100

No gap.

Belt: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Ulm: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Belt: 35/100 · Ulm: 10/100

Belt is 25 points higher.

Belt: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Ulm: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Belt: Unavailable · Ulm: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Belt: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Ulm: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Belt: 25/100 · Ulm: 27/100

Ulm is 2 points higher.

Belt: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ulm: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Belt: 29/100 · Ulm: 29/100

No gap.

Belt: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Ulm: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.