City vs city
Baker vs Ekalaka, MT
Baker currently scores 7 points higher overall than Ekalaka, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Baker: 40/100 · Ekalaka: 33/100
Baker is 7 points higher.
Flood
Baker: Unavailable · Ekalaka: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Baker: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Ekalaka: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Wind
Baker: 18/100 · Ekalaka: 18/100
No gap.
Baker: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Ekalaka: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Baker: 20/100 · Ekalaka: 27/100
Ekalaka is 7 points higher.
Baker: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Ekalaka: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Baker: 65/100 · Ekalaka: 8/100
Baker is 57 points higher.
Baker: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Ekalaka: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Baker: 100/100 · Ekalaka: 99/100
Baker is 1 points higher.
Baker: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Ekalaka: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Baker: Unavailable · Ekalaka: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Baker: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Ekalaka: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Baker: 49/100 · Ekalaka: 53/100
Ekalaka is 4 points higher.
Baker: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ekalaka: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Baker: 27/100 · Ekalaka: 26/100
Baker is 1 points higher.
Baker: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Ekalaka: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city