← Back to Maben snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Maben vs Woodland, MS

Maben currently scores 9 points higher overall than Woodland, with the largest gap in ingested air quality.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Woodland

34/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Maben: 43/100 · Woodland: 34/100

Maben is 9 points higher.

Flood

Maben: 31/100 · Woodland: 30/100

Maben is 1 points higher.

Maben: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

Woodland: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Maben: 16/100 · Woodland: 16/100

No gap.

Maben: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Woodland: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Maben: 76/100 · Woodland: 78/100

Woodland is 2 points higher.

Maben: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Woodland: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Maben: 0/100 · Woodland: 8/100

Woodland is 8 points higher.

Maben: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Woodland: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Maben: 48/100 · Woodland: 43/100

Maben is 5 points higher.

Maben: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Woodland: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Maben: Unavailable · Woodland: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Maben: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Woodland: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Maben: 61/100 · Woodland: 52/100

Maben is 9 points higher.

Maben: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Woodland: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Maben: 27/100 · Woodland: 14/100

Maben is 13 points higher.

Maben: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Woodland: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.