City vs city
Leland vs Rolling Fork, MS
Rolling Fork currently scores 9 points higher overall than Leland, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Leland: 36/100 · Rolling Fork: 45/100
Rolling Fork is 9 points higher.
Flood
Leland: 80/100 · Rolling Fork: 88/100
Rolling Fork is 8 points higher.
Leland: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 14 features intersect this tile.
Rolling Fork: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Leland: 14/100 · Rolling Fork: 15/100
Rolling Fork is 1 points higher.
Leland: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Rolling Fork: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Leland: 65/100 · Rolling Fork: 70/100
Rolling Fork is 5 points higher.
Leland: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Rolling Fork: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Leland: 0/100 · Rolling Fork: 50/100
Rolling Fork is 50 points higher.
Leland: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Rolling Fork: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Leland: 13/100 · Rolling Fork: 41/100
Rolling Fork is 28 points higher.
Leland: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Rolling Fork: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Leland: Unavailable · Rolling Fork: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Leland: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Rolling Fork: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Leland: 22/100 · Rolling Fork: 28/100
Rolling Fork is 6 points higher.
Leland: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Rolling Fork: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Leland: 22/100 · Rolling Fork: 23/100
Rolling Fork is 1 points higher.
Leland: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Rolling Fork: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.