City vs city
Grace vs Rolling Fork, MS
Rolling Fork currently scores 10 points higher overall than Grace, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Grace: 35/100 · Rolling Fork: 45/100
Rolling Fork is 10 points higher.
Flood
Grace: 88/100 · Rolling Fork: 88/100
No gap.
Grace: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.
Rolling Fork: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Grace: 15/100 · Rolling Fork: 15/100
No gap.
Grace: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Rolling Fork: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Grace: 70/100 · Rolling Fork: 70/100
No gap.
Grace: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Rolling Fork: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Grace: 8/100 · Rolling Fork: 50/100
Rolling Fork is 42 points higher.
Grace: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Rolling Fork: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Grace: 17/100 · Rolling Fork: 41/100
Rolling Fork is 24 points higher.
Grace: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Rolling Fork: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Grace: Unavailable · Rolling Fork: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Grace: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Rolling Fork: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Grace: 28/100 · Rolling Fork: 28/100
No gap.
Grace: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Rolling Fork: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Grace: 22/100 · Rolling Fork: 23/100
Rolling Fork is 1 points higher.
Grace: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Rolling Fork: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.