City vs city
Goodman vs Lexington, MS
Lexington currently scores 4 points higher overall than Goodman, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Goodman: 37/100 · Lexington: 41/100
Lexington is 4 points higher.
Flood
Goodman: 55/100 · Lexington: 36/100
Goodman is 19 points higher.
Goodman: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Lexington: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Goodman: 17/100 · Lexington: 17/100
No gap.
Goodman: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lexington: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Goodman: 70/100 · Lexington: 73/100
Lexington is 3 points higher.
Goodman: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Lexington: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Goodman: 23/100 · Lexington: 15/100
Goodman is 8 points higher.
Goodman: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Lexington: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Goodman: 11/100 · Lexington: 62/100
Lexington is 51 points higher.
Goodman: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Lexington: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Goodman: Unavailable · Lexington: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Goodman: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Lexington: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Goodman: 61/100 · Lexington: 59/100
Goodman is 2 points higher.
Goodman: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Lexington: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Goodman: 23/100 · Lexington: 23/100
No gap.
Goodman: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Lexington: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.