← Back to Drew snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Drew vs Webb, MS

Webb currently scores 1 points higher overall than Drew, with the largest gap in tornado.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Drew: 40/100 · Webb: 41/100

Webb is 1 points higher.

Flood

Drew: 42/100 · Webb: 59/100

Webb is 17 points higher.

Drew: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 22 features intersect this tile.

Webb: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Drew: 15/100 · Webb: 15/100

No gap.

Drew: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Webb: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Drew: 62/100 · Webb: 64/100

Webb is 2 points higher.

Drew: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Webb: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Drew: 81/100 · Webb: 19/100

Drew is 62 points higher.

Drew: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Webb: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Drew: 23/100 · Webb: 54/100

Webb is 31 points higher.

Drew: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Webb: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Drew: Unavailable · Webb: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Drew: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Webb: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Drew: 35/100 · Webb: 51/100

Webb is 16 points higher.

Drew: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Webb: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Drew: 22/100 · Webb: 22/100

No gap.

Drew: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Webb: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.