City vs city
Darling vs Marks, MS
Marks currently scores 5 points higher overall than Darling, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Darling: 38/100 · Marks: 43/100
Marks is 5 points higher.
Flood
Darling: 96/100 · Marks: 94/100
Darling is 2 points higher.
Darling: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Marks: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Darling: 14/100 · Marks: 14/100
No gap.
Darling: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Marks: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Darling: 64/100 · Marks: 64/100
No gap.
Darling: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Marks: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Darling: 4/100 · Marks: 23/100
Marks is 19 points higher.
Darling: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Marks: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Darling: 9/100 · Marks: 27/100
Marks is 18 points higher.
Darling: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Marks: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Darling: Unavailable · Marks: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Darling: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Marks: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Darling: 53/100 · Marks: 54/100
Marks is 1 points higher.
Darling: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Marks: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Darling: 23/100 · Marks: 23/100
No gap.
Darling: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Marks: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.