← Back to Crowder snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Crowder vs Marks, MS

Crowder currently scores 1 points higher overall than Marks, with the largest gap in tornado.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Crowder

44/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Crowder: 44/100 · Marks: 43/100

Crowder is 1 points higher.

Flood

Crowder: 88/100 · Marks: 94/100

Marks is 6 points higher.

Crowder: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.

Marks: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Crowder: 14/100 · Marks: 14/100

No gap.

Crowder: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Marks: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Crowder: 66/100 · Marks: 64/100

Crowder is 2 points higher.

Crowder: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Marks: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Crowder: 0/100 · Marks: 23/100

Marks is 23 points higher.

Crowder: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Marks: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Crowder: 11/100 · Marks: 27/100

Marks is 16 points higher.

Crowder: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Marks: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Crowder: Unavailable · Marks: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Crowder: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Marks: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Crowder: 59/100 · Marks: 54/100

Crowder is 5 points higher.

Crowder: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Marks: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Crowder: 23/100 · Marks: 23/100

No gap.

Crowder: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Marks: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.