City vs city
Courtland vs Marks, MS
Marks currently scores 10 points higher overall than Courtland, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Courtland: 33/100 · Marks: 43/100
Marks is 10 points higher.
Flood
Courtland: 37/100 · Marks: 94/100
Marks is 57 points higher.
Courtland: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Marks: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Courtland: 14/100 · Marks: 14/100
No gap.
Courtland: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Marks: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Courtland: 68/100 · Marks: 64/100
Courtland is 4 points higher.
Courtland: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Marks: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Courtland: 8/100 · Marks: 23/100
Marks is 15 points higher.
Courtland: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Marks: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Courtland: 32/100 · Marks: 27/100
Courtland is 5 points higher.
Courtland: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Marks: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Courtland: Unavailable · Marks: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Courtland: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Marks: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Courtland: 52/100 · Marks: 54/100
Marks is 2 points higher.
Courtland: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Marks: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Courtland: 22/100 · Marks: 23/100
Marks is 1 points higher.
Courtland: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Marks: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.