City vs city
Lamar vs Walker, MO
Lamar currently scores 9 points higher overall than Walker, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Lamar: 43/100 · Walker: 34/100
Lamar is 9 points higher.
Flood
Lamar: 53/100 · Walker: 35/100
Lamar is 18 points higher.
Lamar: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Walker: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Lamar: 17/100 · Walker: 17/100
No gap.
Lamar: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Walker: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Lamar: 75/100 · Walker: 66/100
Lamar is 9 points higher.
Lamar: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Walker: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Lamar: 23/100 · Walker: 4/100
Lamar is 19 points higher.
Lamar: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Walker: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Lamar: 68/100 · Walker: 66/100
Lamar is 2 points higher.
Lamar: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Walker: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Lamar: Unavailable · Walker: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Lamar: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Walker: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Lamar: 43/100 · Walker: 29/100
Lamar is 14 points higher.
Lamar: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Walker: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Lamar: 22/100 · Walker: 22/100
No gap.
Lamar: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Walker: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.