City vs city
Fisk vs Sikeston, MO
Fisk currently scores 4 points higher overall than Sikeston, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Fisk: 41/100 · Sikeston: 37/100
Fisk is 4 points higher.
Flood
Fisk: 100/100 · Sikeston: 38/100
Fisk is 62 points higher.
Fisk: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Sikeston: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Fisk: 15/100 · Sikeston: 15/100
No gap.
Fisk: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Sikeston: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Fisk: 70/100 · Sikeston: 54/100
Fisk is 16 points higher.
Fisk: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Sikeston: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Fisk: 15/100 · Sikeston: 50/100
Sikeston is 35 points higher.
Fisk: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Sikeston: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Fisk: 33/100 · Sikeston: 58/100
Sikeston is 25 points higher.
Fisk: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Sikeston: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Fisk: Unavailable · Sikeston: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Fisk: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Sikeston: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Fisk: 29/100 · Sikeston: 22/100
Fisk is 7 points higher.
Fisk: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Sikeston: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Fisk: 25/100 · Sikeston: 23/100
Fisk is 2 points higher.
Fisk: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Sikeston: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.