← Back to Camdenton snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Camdenton vs Macks Creek, MO

Camdenton and Macks Creek are tied on overall score, with the biggest factor difference in wildfire.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Camdenton

43/100

Open city page →

Macks Creek

43/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Camdenton: 43/100 · Macks Creek: 43/100

No gap.

Flood

Camdenton: 43/100 · Macks Creek: 34/100

Camdenton is 9 points higher.

Camdenton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.

Macks Creek: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Camdenton: 17/100 · Macks Creek: 17/100

No gap.

Camdenton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Macks Creek: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Camdenton: 53/100 · Macks Creek: 57/100

Macks Creek is 4 points higher.

Camdenton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Macks Creek: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Camdenton: 27/100 · Macks Creek: 15/100

Camdenton is 12 points higher.

Camdenton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Macks Creek: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Camdenton: 100/100 · Macks Creek: 100/100

No gap.

Camdenton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Macks Creek: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Camdenton: Unavailable · Macks Creek: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Camdenton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Macks Creek: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Camdenton: 43/100 · Macks Creek: 56/100

Macks Creek is 13 points higher.

Camdenton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Macks Creek: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Camdenton: 20/100 · Macks Creek: 20/100

No gap.

Camdenton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Macks Creek: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.