← Back to Rice snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Rice vs Waite Park, MN

Rice currently scores 3 points higher overall than Waite Park, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Waite Park

41/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Rice: 44/100 · Waite Park: 41/100

Rice is 3 points higher.

Flood

Rice: 50/100 · Waite Park: 37/100

Rice is 13 points higher.

Rice: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.

Waite Park: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Rice: 18/100 · Waite Park: 18/100

No gap.

Rice: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Waite Park: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Rice: 32/100 · Waite Park: 31/100

Rice is 1 points higher.

Rice: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Waite Park: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Rice: 23/100 · Waite Park: 35/100

Waite Park is 12 points higher.

Rice: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Waite Park: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Rice: 100/100 · Waite Park: 93/100

Rice is 7 points higher.

Rice: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Waite Park: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Rice: Unavailable · Waite Park: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Rice: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Waite Park: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Rice: 61/100 · Waite Park: 54/100

Rice is 7 points higher.

Rice: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Waite Park: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Rice: 21/100 · Waite Park: 21/100

No gap.

Rice: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Waite Park: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.