City vs city
Oslo vs Thief River Falls, MN
Thief River Falls currently scores 2 points higher overall than Oslo, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Oslo: 33/100 · Thief River Falls: 35/100
Thief River Falls is 2 points higher.
Flood
Oslo: 93/100 · Thief River Falls: 39/100
Oslo is 54 points higher.
Oslo: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Thief River Falls: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Oslo: 18/100 · Thief River Falls: 17/100
Oslo is 1 points higher.
Oslo: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Thief River Falls: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Oslo: 22/100 · Thief River Falls: 15/100
Oslo is 7 points higher.
Oslo: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Thief River Falls: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Oslo: 0/100 · Thief River Falls: 0/100
No gap.
Oslo: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Thief River Falls: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Oslo: 20/100 · Thief River Falls: 51/100
Thief River Falls is 31 points higher.
Oslo: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Thief River Falls: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Oslo: Unavailable · Thief River Falls: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Oslo: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Thief River Falls: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Oslo: 29/100 · Thief River Falls: 54/100
Thief River Falls is 25 points higher.
Oslo: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Thief River Falls: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Oslo: 13/100 · Thief River Falls: 33/100
Thief River Falls is 20 points higher.
Oslo: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Thief River Falls: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.