← Back to Conger snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Conger vs Waseca, MN

Conger currently scores 9 points higher overall than Waseca, with the largest gap in tornado.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Conger

36/100

Open city page →

Waseca

27/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Conger: 36/100 · Waseca: 27/100

Conger is 9 points higher.

Flood

Conger: 30/100 · Waseca: 35/100

Waseca is 5 points higher.

Conger: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.

Waseca: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Conger: 18/100 · Waseca: 18/100

No gap.

Conger: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Waseca: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Conger: 32/100 · Waseca: 28/100

Conger is 4 points higher.

Conger: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Waseca: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Conger: 69/100 · Waseca: 0/100

Conger is 69 points higher.

Conger: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Waseca: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Conger: 66/100 · Waseca: 35/100

Conger is 31 points higher.

Conger: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Waseca: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Conger: Unavailable · Waseca: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Conger: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Waseca: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Conger: 17/100 · Waseca: 21/100

Waseca is 4 points higher.

Conger: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Waseca: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Conger: 21/100 · Waseca: 22/100

Waseca is 1 points higher.

Conger: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Waseca: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.