City vs city
Conger vs Owatonna, MN
Conger currently scores 8 points higher overall than Owatonna, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Conger: 36/100 · Owatonna: 28/100
Conger is 8 points higher.
Flood
Conger: 30/100 · Owatonna: 42/100
Owatonna is 12 points higher.
Conger: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Owatonna: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Conger: 18/100 · Owatonna: 18/100
No gap.
Conger: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Owatonna: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Conger: 32/100 · Owatonna: 27/100
Conger is 5 points higher.
Conger: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Owatonna: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Conger: 69/100 · Owatonna: 8/100
Conger is 61 points higher.
Conger: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Owatonna: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Conger: 66/100 · Owatonna: 64/100
Conger is 2 points higher.
Conger: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Owatonna: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Conger: Unavailable · Owatonna: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Conger: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Owatonna: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Conger: 17/100 · Owatonna: 14/100
Conger is 3 points higher.
Conger: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Owatonna: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Conger: 21/100 · Owatonna: 23/100
Owatonna is 2 points higher.
Conger: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Owatonna: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.