← Back to Chisholm snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Chisholm vs International Falls, MN

Chisholm currently scores 21 points higher overall than International Falls, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Chisholm

41/100

Open city page →

International Falls

20/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Chisholm: 41/100 · International Falls: 20/100

Chisholm is 21 points higher.

Flood

Chisholm: 36/100 · International Falls: 23/100

Chisholm is 13 points higher.

Chisholm: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.

International Falls: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Chisholm: 15/100 · International Falls: 15/100

No gap.

Chisholm: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

International Falls: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Chisholm: 17/100 · International Falls: 11/100

Chisholm is 6 points higher.

Chisholm: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

International Falls: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Chisholm: 0/100 · International Falls: 0/100

No gap.

Chisholm: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

International Falls: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Chisholm: 83/100 · International Falls: 28/100

Chisholm is 55 points higher.

Chisholm: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

International Falls: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Chisholm: Unavailable · International Falls: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Chisholm: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

International Falls: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Chisholm: 60/100 · International Falls: 33/100

Chisholm is 27 points higher.

Chisholm: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

International Falls: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Chisholm: 37/100 · International Falls: 12/100

Chisholm is 25 points higher.

Chisholm: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

International Falls: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.