City vs city
Brooklyn Park vs New Ulm, MN
Brooklyn Park currently scores 14 points higher overall than New Ulm, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Brooklyn Park: 50/100 · New Ulm: 36/100
Brooklyn Park is 14 points higher.
Flood
Brooklyn Park: 40/100 · New Ulm: 44/100
New Ulm is 4 points higher.
Brooklyn Park: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
New Ulm: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Brooklyn Park: 17/100 · New Ulm: 18/100
New Ulm is 1 points higher.
Brooklyn Park: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
New Ulm: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Brooklyn Park: 28/100 · New Ulm: 33/100
New Ulm is 5 points higher.
Brooklyn Park: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
New Ulm: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Brooklyn Park: 85/100 · New Ulm: 15/100
Brooklyn Park is 70 points higher.
Brooklyn Park: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
New Ulm: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Brooklyn Park: 100/100 · New Ulm: 100/100
No gap.
Brooklyn Park: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
New Ulm: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Brooklyn Park: Unavailable · New Ulm: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Brooklyn Park: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
New Ulm: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Brooklyn Park: 52/100 · New Ulm: 22/100
Brooklyn Park is 30 points higher.
Brooklyn Park: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
New Ulm: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Brooklyn Park: 26/100 · New Ulm: 21/100
Brooklyn Park is 5 points higher.
Brooklyn Park: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
New Ulm: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.