← Back to Fraser snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Fraser vs Sterling Heights, MI

Fraser currently scores 5 points higher overall than Sterling Heights, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Fraser

44/100

Open city page →

Sterling Heights

39/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Fraser: 44/100 · Sterling Heights: 39/100

Fraser is 5 points higher.

Flood

Fraser: 57/100 · Sterling Heights: 60/100

Sterling Heights is 3 points higher.

Fraser: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.

Sterling Heights: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Fraser: 16/100 · Sterling Heights: 16/100

No gap.

Fraser: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Sterling Heights: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Fraser: 40/100 · Sterling Heights: 41/100

Sterling Heights is 1 points higher.

Fraser: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Sterling Heights: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Fraser: 27/100 · Sterling Heights: 8/100

Fraser is 19 points higher.

Fraser: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Sterling Heights: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Fraser: 92/100 · Sterling Heights: 66/100

Fraser is 26 points higher.

Fraser: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Sterling Heights: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Fraser: Unavailable · Sterling Heights: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Fraser: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Sterling Heights: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Fraser: 49/100 · Sterling Heights: 52/100

Sterling Heights is 3 points higher.

Fraser: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Sterling Heights: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Fraser: 28/100 · Sterling Heights: 28/100

No gap.

Fraser: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Sterling Heights: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.