City vs city
Escanaba vs Gladstone, MI
Gladstone currently scores 8 points higher overall than Escanaba, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Escanaba: 22/100 · Gladstone: 30/100
Gladstone is 8 points higher.
Flood
Escanaba: 53/100 · Gladstone: 50/100
Escanaba is 3 points higher.
Escanaba: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.
Gladstone: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Escanaba: 13/100 · Gladstone: 13/100
No gap.
Escanaba: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Gladstone: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Escanaba: 17/100 · Gladstone: 16/100
Escanaba is 1 points higher.
Escanaba: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Gladstone: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Escanaba: 8/100 · Gladstone: 15/100
Gladstone is 7 points higher.
Escanaba: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Gladstone: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Escanaba: 30/100 · Gladstone: 50/100
Gladstone is 20 points higher.
Escanaba: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Gladstone: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Escanaba: Unavailable · Gladstone: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Escanaba: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Gladstone: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Escanaba: 8/100 · Gladstone: 39/100
Gladstone is 31 points higher.
Escanaba: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Gladstone: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Escanaba: 26/100 · Gladstone: 27/100
Gladstone is 1 points higher.
Escanaba: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Gladstone: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.