City vs city
Easton vs Mardela Springs, MD
Easton and Mardela Springs are tied on overall score, with the biggest factor difference in storm surge.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Easton: 33/100 · Mardela Springs: 33/100
No gap.
Flood
Easton: 25/100 · Mardela Springs: 26/100
Mardela Springs is 1 points higher.
Easton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Mardela Springs: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Easton: 22/100 · Mardela Springs: 25/100
Mardela Springs is 3 points higher.
Easton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Mardela Springs: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Easton: 26/100 · Mardela Springs: 23/100
Easton is 3 points higher.
Easton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Mardela Springs: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Easton: 0/100 · Mardela Springs: 15/100
Mardela Springs is 15 points higher.
Easton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Mardela Springs: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Easton: 51/100 · Mardela Springs: 12/100
Easton is 39 points higher.
Easton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Mardela Springs: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Easton: 14/100 · Mardela Springs: 73/100
Mardela Springs is 59 points higher.
Easton: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Mardela Springs: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Easton: 51/100 · Mardela Springs: 56/100
Mardela Springs is 5 points higher.
Easton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Mardela Springs: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Easton: 40/100 · Mardela Springs: 31/100
Easton is 9 points higher.
Easton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Mardela Springs: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.